Huawei nova vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei nova vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175 USD vs 189 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (99 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (172 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (315 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (699 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (304 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (321 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.16 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3020mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.86 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (967 points vs 99 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 172 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 315 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 699 points)
Better display (994 points vs 304 points)
Better design (928 points vs 321 points)
Against:
Higher price (189 USD vs 175 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.16 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 70.86 percents)