Meizu M5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Meizu M5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (123.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (292 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (107 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (201 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (337 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (73 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (277 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3070mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (282 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.79 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 123.99 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 292 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 107 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 201 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 337 points)
Better display (630 points vs 73 points)
Better design (670 points vs 277 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3070mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 282 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 69.79 percents)