Huawei Mate 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 9 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (336.98 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (371 points vs 375 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 748 points)
Worse performance (587 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (788 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (681 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (431 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (534 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (73.39 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (375 points vs 371 points)
Better battery (748 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 587 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 788 points)
Better display (996 points vs 681 points)
Better design (967 points vs 431 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 336.98 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4600mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 534 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 73.39 percents)