Nokia 6 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 6 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (188.9 USD vs 189 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (289 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (273 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (264 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (357 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (303 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.67 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (967 points vs 289 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 273 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 264 points)
Better display (994 points vs 357 points)
Better design (929 points vs 303 points)
Against:
Higher price (189 USD vs 188.9 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1400 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 71.67 percents)