Ulefone Gemini vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Ulefone Gemini vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (159.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (309 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (218 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (195 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (69 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (413 points vs 688 points)
Worse design (255 points vs 447 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3250mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (70.51 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 159.99 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 309 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 218 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 195 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 69 points)
Better display (688 points vs 413 points)
Better design (447 points vs 255 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 70.51 percents)