BlackBerry KEYone vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: BlackBerry KEYone vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (439.99 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse camera (338 points vs 779 points)
Worse battery (206 points vs 579 points)
Worse performance (315 points vs 725 points)
Worse connectivity (788 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (107 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (112 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.29 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3505mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (433 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (4.5 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (55.89 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 439.99 USD)
Better camera (779 points vs 338 points)
Better battery (579 points vs 206 points)
Better performance (725 points vs 315 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 788 points)
Better display (910 points vs 107 points)
Better design (993 points vs 112 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.29 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4250mAh vs 3505mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 4.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 433 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.48 percents vs 55.89 percents)