Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (144.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Better connectivity (702 points vs 516 points)
Against:
Worse camera (632 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (69 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (431 points vs 476 points)
Worse display (411 points vs 688 points)
Worse design (414 points vs 447 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (15.87 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (367 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.38 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (766 points vs 632 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 69 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 431 points)
Better display (688 points vs 411 points)
Better design (447 points vs 414 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 144.99 USD)
Worse connectivity (516 points vs 702 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 22 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.87 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 367 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 76.38 percents)