Sony Xperia XZ Premium Dual vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ Premium Dual vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (979 points vs 523 points)
Against:
Higher price (255.99 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (567 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (216 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (599 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (883 points vs 956 points)
Worse design (323 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3230mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (801 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.65 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 255.99 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 567 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 216 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 599 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 883 points)
Better design (600 points vs 323 points)
Against:
Worse display (523 points vs 979 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3230mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 801 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 69.65 percents)