Ulefone Armor 2 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Ulefone Armor 2 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (756 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Higher price (263.29 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (463 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (695 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (639 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (304 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (53 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4700mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (55.54 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 263.29 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 463 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 695 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 639 points)
Better display (994 points vs 304 points)
Better design (928 points vs 53 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 756 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 55.54 percents)