Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos vs UMiDIGI S3 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (969 points vs 631 points)
Against:
Higher price (255.22 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Worse camera (347 points vs 933 points)
Worse battery (81 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (556 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (680 points vs 850 points)
Worse design (759 points vs 760 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
More gpu cores (20 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (546 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (568 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.47 percents vs 83.4 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (174.99 USD vs 255.22 USD)
Better camera (933 points vs 347 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 81 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 556 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 680 points)
Better design (760 points vs 759 points)
Against:
Worse display (631 points vs 969 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 546 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 20 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 568 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.4 percents vs 84.47 percents)