Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos vs UMiDIGI F2
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos vs UMiDIGI F2
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (968 points vs 521 points)
Better design (758 points vs 599 points)
Against:
Higher price (255.22 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Worse camera (345 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (82 points vs 868 points)
Worse performance (554 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 956 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
More gpu cores (20 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (546 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (568 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.8 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.47 percents vs 83.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (254.99 USD vs 255.22 USD)
Better camera (914 points vs 345 points)
Better battery (868 points vs 82 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 554 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 679 points)
Against:
Worse display (521 points vs 968 points)
Worse design (599 points vs 758 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 546 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 20 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.8 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 568 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.12 percents vs 84.47 percents)