AGM X2 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

For:

      Better battery (927 points vs 772 points)

Against:

      Higher price (869.99 USD vs 739.72 USD)

      Worse camera (563 points vs 600 points)

      Worse performance (635 points vs 756 points)

      Worse connectivity (609 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (431 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (82 points vs 991 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.9)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (59.53 percents vs 91.65 percents)

For:

      Lower price (739.72 USD vs 869.99 USD)

      Better camera (600 points vs 563 points)

      Better performance (756 points vs 635 points)

      Better connectivity (832 points vs 609 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 431 points)

      Better design (991 points vs 82 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (772 points vs 927 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.9 vs f/2)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 5.5 inches)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 59.53 percents)