Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (147.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (90 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (59 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (132 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (258 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (83 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (283 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2620mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (74.87 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (764 points vs 90 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 59 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 132 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 258 points)
Better display (684 points vs 83 points)
Better design (441 points vs 283 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 147.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2620mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1450 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 74.87 percents)