Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia L1 Dual vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (147.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (90 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (60 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (133 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (264 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (83 points vs 688 points)
Worse design (285 points vs 447 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2620mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (74.87 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (766 points vs 90 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 60 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 133 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 264 points)
Better display (688 points vs 83 points)
Better design (447 points vs 285 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 147.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2620mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1450 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 74.87 percents)