VKworld Mix Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: VKworld Mix Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (162.25 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (43 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (115 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (74 points vs 476 points)
Worse connectivity (119 points vs 516 points)
Worse display (122 points vs 688 points)
Worse design (418 points vs 447 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2850mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (79.06 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 162.25 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 43 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 115 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 74 points)
Better connectivity (516 points vs 119 points)
Better display (688 points vs 122 points)
Better design (447 points vs 418 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 2850mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 79.06 percents)