Nokia 8 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Nokia 8 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (329.71 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (393 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (186 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (597 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (395 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (562 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (298 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3090mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (554 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.3 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.58 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 329.71 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 393 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 186 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 597 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 395 points)
Better display (994 points vs 562 points)
Better design (928 points vs 298 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3090mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.3 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 554 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 69.58 percents)