Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus vs Cubot J5
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus vs Cubot J5
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.95 USD vs 69.99 USD)
Better camera (263 points vs 19 points)
Better battery (377 points vs 103 points)
Better performance (317 points vs 54 points)
Better connectivity (339 points vs 6 points)
Better display (453 points vs 19 points)
Better design (517 points vs 253 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2800mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.99 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 195 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.68 percents vs 72.37 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (69.99 USD vs 58.95 USD)
Worse camera (19 points vs 263 points)
Worse battery (103 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (54 points vs 317 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 339 points)
Worse display (19 points vs 453 points)
Worse design (253 points vs 517 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2800mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 5.99 inch)
Lower pixel density (195 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (72.37 percents vs 77.68 percents)