Leagoo KIICAA Mix vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Leagoo KIICAA Mix vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (149.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (217 points vs 767 points)
Worse battery (81 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (259 points vs 477 points)
Worse connectivity (224 points vs 517 points)
Worse display (357 points vs 689 points)
Worse design (407 points vs 449 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.89 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (767 points vs 217 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 81 points)
Better performance (477 points vs 259 points)
Better connectivity (517 points vs 224 points)
Better display (689 points vs 357 points)
Better design (449 points vs 407 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 149.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 77.89 percents)