Leagoo KIICAA Mix vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Leagoo KIICAA Mix vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (149.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (216 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (81 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (255 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (217 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (352 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (399 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.89 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (764 points vs 216 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 81 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 255 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 217 points)
Better display (684 points vs 352 points)
Better design (441 points vs 399 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 149.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 77.89 percents)