Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (951 points vs 900 points)
Against:
Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (194 points vs 764 points)
Worse performance (139 points vs 471 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 512 points)
Worse display (174 points vs 684 points)
Worse design (275 points vs 441 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6200mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 194 points)
Better performance (471 points vs 139 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 46 points)
Better display (684 points vs 174 points)
Better design (441 points vs 275 points)
Against:
Worse battery (900 points vs 951 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (6000mAh vs 6200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 71.29 percents)