Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Vernee Thor Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (950 points vs 900 points)
Against:
Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (196 points vs 767 points)
Worse performance (140 points vs 477 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 517 points)
Worse display (176 points vs 689 points)
Worse design (280 points vs 449 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6200mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Better camera (767 points vs 196 points)
Better performance (477 points vs 140 points)
Better connectivity (517 points vs 46 points)
Better display (689 points vs 176 points)
Better design (449 points vs 280 points)
Against:
Worse battery (900 points vs 950 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (6000mAh vs 6200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 71.29 percents)