Vernee Thor Plus vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Vernee Thor Plus vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Better battery (950 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Worse camera (195 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (140 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (46 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (175 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (278 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (267 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.29 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (967 points vs 195 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 140 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 46 points)
Better display (994 points vs 175 points)
Better design (928 points vs 278 points)
Against:
Higher price (189 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Worse battery (643 points vs 950 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 267 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 71.29 percents)