Cubot Note Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Compare Phones: Cubot Note Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (115.99 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse camera (467 points vs 703 points)
Worse battery (56 points vs 530 points)
Worse performance (195 points vs 279 points)
Worse connectivity (53 points vs 291 points)
Worse display (275 points vs 513 points)
Worse design (266 points vs 574 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (13.13 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (13.38 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2800mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.41 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 115.99 USD)
Better camera (703 points vs 467 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 56 points)
Better performance (279 points vs 195 points)
Better connectivity (291 points vs 53 points)
Better display (513 points vs 275 points)
Better design (574 points vs 266 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 13.13 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 13.38 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 2800mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 69.41 percents)