Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia XZ1 vs UMiDIGI A9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (142.48 USD vs 148.19 USD)
Better performance (597 points vs 506 points)
Against:
Worse camera (328 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (69 points vs 533 points)
Worse connectivity (702 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (332 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (335 points vs 573 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (19.2 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2450 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (710 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (69.22 percents vs 82.23 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 328 points)
Better battery (533 points vs 69 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 702 points)
Better display (630 points vs 332 points)
Better design (573 points vs 335 points)
Against:
Higher price (148.19 USD vs 142.48 USD)
Worse performance (506 points vs 597 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 19.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4150mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 710 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2450 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.23 percents vs 69.22 percents)