nubia Z17 Lite vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: nubia Z17 Lite vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (195.89 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (577 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (207 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (636 points vs 757 points)
Worse connectivity (339 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (414 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (403 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.48 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 195.89 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 577 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 207 points)
Better performance (757 points vs 636 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 339 points)
Better display (994 points vs 414 points)
Better design (929 points vs 403 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 75.48 percents)