nubia Z17 Lite vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: nubia Z17 Lite vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (195.89 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (576 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (206 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (635 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (337 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (413 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (401 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.48 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 195.89 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 576 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 206 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 635 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 337 points)
Better display (994 points vs 413 points)
Better design (928 points vs 401 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 75.48 percents)