Oukitel C8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Oukitel C8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (65 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (62 points vs 809 points)
Worse battery (82 points vs 308 points)
Worse performance (54 points vs 464 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 374 points)
Worse display (103 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (219 points vs 670 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.4 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (260 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.56 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 65 USD)
Better camera (809 points vs 62 points)
Better battery (308 points vs 82 points)
Better performance (464 points vs 54 points)
Better connectivity (374 points vs 30 points)
Better display (630 points vs 103 points)
Better design (670 points vs 219 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.4)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5.5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 260 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 75.56 percents)