Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Compare Phones: Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (623 points vs 309 points)
Against:
Higher price (99.99 USD vs 58.82 USD)
Worse camera (40 points vs 810 points)
Worse performance (54 points vs 466 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 376 points)
Worse display (46 points vs 631 points)
Worse design (50 points vs 671 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 13.25 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4400mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (56.35 percents vs 82 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.82 USD vs 99.99 USD)
Better camera (810 points vs 40 points)
Better performance (466 points vs 54 points)
Better connectivity (376 points vs 30 points)
Better display (631 points vs 46 points)
Better design (671 points vs 50 points)
Against:
Worse battery (309 points vs 623 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (13.25 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 5 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82 percents vs 56.35 percents)