Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Compare Phones: Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (623 points vs 530 points)
Against:
Higher price (99.99 USD vs 94.5 USD)
Worse camera (40 points vs 601 points)
Worse performance (54 points vs 520 points)
Worse connectivity (30 points vs 479 points)
Worse display (46 points vs 514 points)
Worse design (50 points vs 576 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4400mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (56.35 percents vs 84.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (94.5 USD vs 99.99 USD)
Better camera (601 points vs 40 points)
Better performance (520 points vs 54 points)
Better connectivity (479 points vs 30 points)
Better display (514 points vs 46 points)
Better design (576 points vs 50 points)
Against:
Worse battery (530 points vs 623 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4400mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5 inches)
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 56.35 percents)