Oukitel Mix 2 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Oukitel Mix 2 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (221.45 USD vs 189 USD)
Worse camera (447 points vs 967 points)
Worse battery (501 points vs 643 points)
Worse performance (638 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (69 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (398 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (408 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.82 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (28 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4080mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2390 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.99 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.39 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (189 USD vs 221.45 USD)
Better camera (967 points vs 447 points)
Better battery (643 points vs 501 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 638 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 69 points)
Better display (994 points vs 398 points)
Better design (928 points vs 408 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.82 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 28 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4080mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2390 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 5.99 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 78.39 percents)