Huawei Mate 10 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 10 vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (552 points vs 393 points)
Against:
Higher price (450.54 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Worse camera (414 points vs 964 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (579 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (805 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (739 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (11.81 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2360 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (498 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.9 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.22 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (384.99 USD vs 450.54 USD)
Better camera (964 points vs 414 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 579 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 805 points)
Better display (900 points vs 739 points)
Against:
Worse design (393 points vs 552 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 11.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2360 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 5.9 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 498 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 82.22 percents)