Zeblaze THOR PRO vs ZGPAX S99c
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (85.48 USD vs 104.91 USD)
Better battery (826 points vs 555 points)
Better usability (881 points vs 682 points)
Against:
Worse performance (797 points vs 860 points)
Camera |
|
Screen |
|
For:
IPS
Against:
Lower screen resolution (320 x 320 pixels vs 400 x 400 pixels)
Networks |
|
Performance |
|
Battery |
|
For:
Bigger battery capacity (500 mAh vs 400 mAh)
Usability |
|
For:
With WiFi support
Against:
Not waterproof
Without USB support
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (860 points vs 797 points)
Against:
Higher price (104.91 USD vs 85.48 USD)
Worse battery (555 points vs 826 points)
Worse usability (682 points vs 881 points)
Camera |
|
Screen |
|
For:
Higher screen resolution (400 x 400 pixels vs 320 x 320 pixels)
Against:
Not IPS
Networks |
|
Performance |
|
Battery |
|
Against:
Smaller battery capacity (400 mAh vs 500 mAh)
Usability |
|
For:
Waterproof
With USB support
Against:
Without WiFi support