Koolnee K1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Koolnee K1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (192.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (339 points vs 766 points)
Worse battery (201 points vs 900 points)
Worse performance (333 points vs 475 points)
Worse connectivity (59 points vs 515 points)
Worse display (410 points vs 687 points)
Worse design (416 points vs 446 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3190mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.01 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.48 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 192.99 USD)
Better camera (766 points vs 339 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 201 points)
Better performance (475 points vs 333 points)
Better connectivity (515 points vs 59 points)
Better display (687 points vs 410 points)
Better design (446 points vs 416 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3190mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.01 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 80.48 percents)