UMI eMax mini vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Compare Phones: UMI eMax mini vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (58.49 USD vs 58.95 USD)
Better camera (299 points vs 263 points)
Against:
Worse battery (179 points vs 377 points)
Worse performance (193 points vs 317 points)
Worse connectivity (264 points vs 339 points)
Worse display (304 points vs 453 points)
Worse design (211 points vs 517 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 12 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3050mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (550 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 5.99 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.06 percents vs 77.68 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (377 points vs 179 points)
Better performance (317 points vs 193 points)
Better connectivity (339 points vs 264 points)
Better display (453 points vs 304 points)
Better design (517 points vs 211 points)
Against:
Higher price (58.95 USD vs 58.49 USD)
Worse camera (263 points vs 299 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (12 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 3050mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 550 megahertz)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.99 inch vs 5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (77.68 percents vs 71.06 percents)