Vivo NEX vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Compare Phones: Vivo NEX vs OnePlus 8 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better design (945 points vs 907 points)
Against:
Higher price (741.99 USD vs 662.31 USD)
Worse camera (353 points vs 951 points)
Worse battery (376 points vs 704 points)
Worse performance (687 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (559 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (437 points vs 990 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4510mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.59 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Lower pixel density (388 pixels per inch vs 513 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.31 percents vs 91.14 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (662.31 USD vs 741.99 USD)
Better camera (951 points vs 353 points)
Better battery (704 points vs 376 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 687 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 559 points)
Better display (990 points vs 437 points)
Against:
Worse design (907 points vs 945 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4510mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.59 inches)
Higher pixel density (513 pixels per inch vs 388 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.14 percents vs 86.31 percents)