Apple iPhone XS Max vs Xiaomi Mi 10
Compare Phones: Apple iPhone XS Max vs Xiaomi Mi 10
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (959 points vs 640 points)
Better design (880 points vs 833 points)
Against:
Higher price (1540.64 USD vs 500.25 USD)
Worse camera (273 points vs 974 points)
Worse battery (119 points vs 767 points)
Worse performance (213 points vs 929 points)
Worse display (683 points vs 901 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3174mAh vs 4780mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1100 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Less cpu cores (6 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.41 percents vs 90.08 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (500.25 USD vs 1540.64 USD)
Better camera (974 points vs 273 points)
Better battery (767 points vs 119 points)
Better performance (929 points vs 213 points)
Better display (901 points vs 683 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (640 points vs 959 points)
Worse design (833 points vs 880 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4780mAh vs 3174mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 6 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 1100 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 85.41 percents)