UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Cubot R15
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI S3 Pro vs Cubot R15
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (933 points vs 50 points)
Better battery (868 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 34 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 6 points)
Better display (630 points vs 203 points)
Better design (759 points vs 400 points)
Against:
Higher price (174.99 USD vs 165.5 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.09 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (19.66 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 6.26 inch)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.4 percents vs 80.76 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (165.5 USD vs 174.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (50 points vs 933 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 868 points)
Worse performance (34 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (6 points vs 850 points)
Worse display (203 points vs 630 points)
Worse design (400 points vs 759 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.09 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 19.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.26 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.76 percents vs 83.4 percents)