UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better connectivity (699 points vs 512 points)

      Better design (462 points vs 441 points)

Against:

      Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (555 points vs 764 points)

      Worse battery (870 points vs 900 points)

      Worse performance (439 points vs 471 points)

      Worse display (628 points vs 684 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.57 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)

      Better camera (764 points vs 555 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 870 points)

      Better performance (471 points vs 439 points)

      Better display (684 points vs 628 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (512 points vs 699 points)

      Worse design (441 points vs 462 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.57 percents)