UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better connectivity (702 points vs 516 points)

      Better design (468 points vs 447 points)

Against:

      Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (559 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (868 points vs 900 points)

      Worse performance (444 points vs 476 points)

      Worse display (630 points vs 688 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.57 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)

      Better camera (766 points vs 559 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 868 points)

      Better performance (476 points vs 444 points)

      Better display (688 points vs 630 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (516 points vs 702 points)

      Worse design (447 points vs 468 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.57 percents)