UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better connectivity (701 points vs 514 points)

      Better design (467 points vs 445 points)

Against:

      Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (557 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (869 points vs 899 points)

      Worse performance (443 points vs 474 points)

      Worse display (629 points vs 687 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.57 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)

      Better camera (766 points vs 557 points)

      Better battery (899 points vs 869 points)

      Better performance (474 points vs 443 points)

      Better display (687 points vs 629 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (514 points vs 701 points)

      Worse design (445 points vs 467 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.57 percents)