UMiDIGI Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better connectivity (703 points vs 517 points)

      Better design (470 points vs 449 points)

Against:

      Higher price (175.99 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (560 points vs 767 points)

      Worse battery (869 points vs 900 points)

      Worse performance (446 points vs 477 points)

      Worse display (631 points vs 689 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.57 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 175.99 USD)

      Better camera (767 points vs 560 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 869 points)

      Better performance (477 points vs 446 points)

      Better display (689 points vs 631 points)

Against:

      Worse connectivity (517 points vs 703 points)

      Worse design (449 points vs 470 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 83.57 percents)