UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (914 points vs 643 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 713 points)
Better performance (711 points vs 116 points)
Better connectivity (956 points vs 154 points)
Better display (523 points vs 247 points)
Better design (600 points vs 460 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 239.66 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 81.9 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (239.66 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (643 points vs 914 points)
Worse battery (713 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (116 points vs 711 points)
Worse connectivity (154 points vs 956 points)
Worse display (247 points vs 523 points)
Worse design (460 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.9 percents vs 83.12 percents)