UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Compare Phones: UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (913 points vs 638 points)
Better battery (870 points vs 712 points)
Better performance (708 points vs 114 points)
Better connectivity (955 points vs 148 points)
Better display (518 points vs 246 points)
Better design (595 points vs 453 points)
Against:
Higher price (254.99 USD vs 239.66 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 81.9 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (239.66 USD vs 254.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (638 points vs 913 points)
Worse battery (712 points vs 870 points)
Worse performance (114 points vs 708 points)
Worse connectivity (148 points vs 955 points)
Worse display (246 points vs 518 points)
Worse design (453 points vs 595 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.9 percents vs 83.12 percents)