UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

For:

      Lower price (254.99 USD vs 278.96 USD)

      Better camera (913 points vs 666 points)

      Better battery (870 points vs 773 points)

      Better performance (708 points vs 260 points)

      Better connectivity (955 points vs 331 points)

      Better design (595 points vs 507 points)

Against:

      Worse display (518 points vs 588 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.6 inch)

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 399 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.6 percents)

For:

      Better display (588 points vs 518 points)

Against:

      Higher price (278.96 USD vs 254.99 USD)

      Worse camera (666 points vs 913 points)

      Worse battery (773 points vs 870 points)

      Worse performance (260 points vs 708 points)

      Worse connectivity (331 points vs 955 points)

      Worse design (507 points vs 595 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

Against:

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.6 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (399 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.6 percents vs 83.12 percents)