UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

For:

      Lower price (254.99 USD vs 278.96 USD)

      Better camera (914 points vs 669 points)

      Better battery (868 points vs 772 points)

      Better performance (711 points vs 262 points)

      Better connectivity (956 points vs 337 points)

      Better design (599 points vs 511 points)

Against:

      Worse display (521 points vs 590 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.6 inch)

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 399 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.6 percents)

For:

      Better display (590 points vs 521 points)

Against:

      Higher price (278.96 USD vs 254.99 USD)

      Worse camera (669 points vs 914 points)

      Worse battery (772 points vs 868 points)

      Worse performance (262 points vs 711 points)

      Worse connectivity (337 points vs 956 points)

      Worse design (511 points vs 599 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

Against:

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.6 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (399 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.6 percents vs 83.12 percents)