UMiDIGI F2 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

For:

      Lower price (254.99 USD vs 278.96 USD)

      Better camera (913 points vs 665 points)

      Better battery (870 points vs 772 points)

      Better performance (707 points vs 261 points)

      Better connectivity (955 points vs 330 points)

      Better design (594 points vs 506 points)

Against:

      Worse display (517 points vs 587 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      More gpu cores (3 cores vs 2 cores)

      More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.6 inch)

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 399 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.12 percents vs 82.6 percents)

For:

      Better display (587 points vs 517 points)

Against:

      Higher price (278.96 USD vs 254.99 USD)

      Worse camera (665 points vs 913 points)

      Worse battery (772 points vs 870 points)

      Worse performance (261 points vs 707 points)

      Worse connectivity (330 points vs 955 points)

      Worse design (506 points vs 594 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)

Against:

      Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 3 cores)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.6 inch vs 6.53 inches)

      Higher pixel density (399 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.6 percents vs 83.12 percents)