Nokia 2720 Flip vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Nokia 2720 Flip vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (169.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (4 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (4 points vs 772 points)
Worse performance (92 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (178 points vs 850 points)
Worse design (34 points vs 202 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (1500mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (2 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (512 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (2.8 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Lower pixel density (143 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (23.19 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 169.99 USD)
Better camera (815 points vs 4 points)
Better battery (772 points vs 4 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 92 points)
Better connectivity (850 points vs 178 points)
Better design (202 points vs 34 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 1500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 2 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1100 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 512 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.3 inch vs 2.8 inches)
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 143 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (75.28 percents vs 23.19 percents)