Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (974 points vs 753 points)
Better battery (767 points vs 706 points)
Better performance (929 points vs 560 points)
Against:
Higher price (500.25 USD vs 475.66 USD)
Worse connectivity (640 points vs 729 points)
Worse display (901 points vs 937 points)
Worse design (833 points vs 936 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4780mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Lower pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 86.16 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (475.66 USD vs 500.25 USD)
Better connectivity (729 points vs 640 points)
Better display (937 points vs 901 points)
Better design (936 points vs 833 points)
Against:
Worse camera (753 points vs 974 points)
Worse battery (706 points vs 767 points)
Worse performance (560 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4780mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.16 percents vs 90.08 percents)