OnePlus 8 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Compare Phones: OnePlus 8 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (825 points vs 256 points)
Better battery (585 points vs 133 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 85 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 500 points)
Better display (910 points vs 120 points)
Better design (948 points vs 209 points)
Against:
Higher price (448.56 USD vs 433.9 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 3000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 5.3 inch)
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 331 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.98 percents vs 64.59 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (433.9 USD vs 448.56 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (256 points vs 825 points)
Worse battery (133 points vs 585 points)
Worse performance (85 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (500 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (120 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (209 points vs 948 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.3 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Lower pixel density (331 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (64.59 percents vs 88.98 percents)