Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs OnePlus 9 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (182.99 USD vs 189 USD)
Better battery (742 points vs 643 points)
Against:
Worse camera (798 points vs 967 points)
Worse performance (168 points vs 756 points)
Worse connectivity (264 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (688 points vs 994 points)
Worse design (579 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.77 inch)
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.81 percents vs 92.12 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (967 points vs 798 points)
Better performance (756 points vs 168 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 264 points)
Better display (994 points vs 688 points)
Better design (928 points vs 579 points)
Against:
Higher price (189 USD vs 182.99 USD)
Worse battery (643 points vs 742 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 83.81 percents)