Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Nokia X10
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Nokia X10
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (979 points vs 619 points)
Better battery (889 points vs 640 points)
Better performance (701 points vs 537 points)
Better display (877 points vs 607 points)
Better design (564 points vs 463 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 299.9 USD)
Worse connectivity (479 points vs 501 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4470mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 80.03 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (299.9 USD vs 317 USD)
Better connectivity (501 points vs 479 points)
Against:
Worse camera (619 points vs 979 points)
Worse battery (640 points vs 889 points)
Worse performance (537 points vs 701 points)
Worse display (607 points vs 877 points)
Worse design (463 points vs 564 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4470mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.03 percents vs 88.05 percents)