Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs Ulefone Note 8P
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs Ulefone Note 8P
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (703 points vs 36 points)
Better battery (530 points vs 50 points)
Better performance (279 points vs 42 points)
Better connectivity (291 points vs 153 points)
Better display (513 points vs 17 points)
Better design (574 points vs 176 points)
Against:
Higher price (89.99 USD vs 82.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 16 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 2.09 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 2700mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 1 cores)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.57 inch vs 5.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 192 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 78.93 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (82.99 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (36 points vs 703 points)
Worse battery (50 points vs 530 points)
Worse performance (42 points vs 279 points)
Worse connectivity (153 points vs 291 points)
Worse display (17 points vs 513 points)
Worse design (176 points vs 574 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (16 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (2.09 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2700mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (1 cores vs 5 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.5 inch vs 6.57 inch)
Lower pixel density (192 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (78.93 percents vs 84.08 percents)