HTC U20 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: HTC U20 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (801 points vs 601 points)
Better performance (896 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Higher price (758.4 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse connectivity (501 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (657 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (589 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.8 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (387 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.76 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 758.4 USD)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 501 points)
Better display (996 points vs 657 points)
Better design (991 points vs 589 points)
Against:
Worse camera (601 points vs 801 points)
Worse performance (757 points vs 896 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.8 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 387 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 83.76 percents)