HTC U20 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

For:

      Better camera (801 points vs 600 points)

      Better performance (895 points vs 756 points)

Against:

      Higher price (758.4 USD vs 739.72 USD)

      Worse connectivity (500 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (656 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (587 points vs 991 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.8 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (387 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.76 percents vs 91.65 percents)

For:

      Lower price (739.72 USD vs 758.4 USD)

      Better connectivity (832 points vs 500 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 656 points)

      Better design (991 points vs 587 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (600 points vs 801 points)

      Worse performance (756 points vs 895 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.8 inches)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 387 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 83.76 percents)