Vivo iQOO 5 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Compare Phones: Vivo iQOO 5 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (929 points vs 757 points)
Against:
Higher price (860.99 USD vs 739.72 USD)
Worse camera (127 points vs 601 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 773 points)
Worse connectivity (806 points vs 833 points)
Worse display (801 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (799 points vs 991 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.56 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (89.71 percents vs 91.65 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (739.72 USD vs 860.99 USD)
Better camera (601 points vs 127 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 377 points)
Better connectivity (833 points vs 806 points)
Better display (996 points vs 801 points)
Better design (991 points vs 799 points)
Against:
Worse performance (757 points vs 929 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.56 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 89.71 percents)