Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T

For:

      Better design (513 points vs 447 points)

Against:

      Higher price (198.23 USD vs 158 USD)

      Worse camera (102 points vs 766 points)

      Worse battery (712 points vs 900 points)

      Worse performance (295 points vs 476 points)

      Worse connectivity (59 points vs 516 points)

      Worse display (181 points vs 688 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)

      Lower pixel density (259 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.89 percents vs 83.7 percents)

For:

      Lower price (158 USD vs 198.23 USD)

      Better camera (766 points vs 102 points)

      Better battery (900 points vs 712 points)

      Better performance (476 points vs 295 points)

      Better connectivity (516 points vs 59 points)

      Better display (688 points vs 181 points)

Against:

      Worse design (447 points vs 513 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inches)

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 259 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 84.89 percents)