Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Oppo A55

For:

      Lower price (339.99 USD vs 359.04 USD)

      Better camera (377 points vs 130 points)

      Better battery (749 points vs 713 points)

      Better performance (757 points vs 474 points)

      Better connectivity (833 points vs 391 points)

      Better display (996 points vs 247 points)

      Better design (967 points vs 627 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 955 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.5 inch)

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 270 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 82.48 percents)

Against:

      Higher price (359.04 USD vs 339.99 USD)

      Worse camera (130 points vs 377 points)

      Worse battery (713 points vs 749 points)

      Worse performance (474 points vs 757 points)

      Worse connectivity (391 points vs 833 points)

      Worse display (247 points vs 996 points)

      Worse design (627 points vs 967 points)

For:

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4600mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (955 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.81 inch)

      Lower pixel density (270 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.48 percents vs 91.65 percents)