Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Vivo iQOO U3x 5G
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Vivo iQOO U3x 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (339.99 USD vs 349.06 USD)
Better camera (372 points vs 158 points)
Better battery (748 points vs 712 points)
Better performance (754 points vs 532 points)
Better connectivity (830 points vs 430 points)
Better display (996 points vs 572 points)
Better design (967 points vs 730 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.58 inch)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 400 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 84.79 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (349.06 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Worse camera (158 points vs 372 points)
Worse battery (712 points vs 748 points)
Worse performance (532 points vs 754 points)
Worse connectivity (430 points vs 830 points)
Worse display (572 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (730 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.58 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (400 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.79 percents vs 91.65 percents)