OnePlus 9 Pro vs Nokia G20

For:

      Lower price (189 USD vs 260.57 USD)

      Better camera (967 points vs 613 points)

      Better performance (754 points vs 243 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 512 points)

      Better display (994 points vs 264 points)

      Better design (928 points vs 446 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (642 points vs 858 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5050mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.52 inch)

      Higher pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 82.08 percents)

For:

      Better battery (858 points vs 642 points)

Against:

      Higher price (260.57 USD vs 189 USD)

      Worse camera (613 points vs 967 points)

      Worse performance (243 points vs 754 points)

      Worse connectivity (512 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (264 points vs 994 points)

      Worse design (446 points vs 928 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5050mAh vs 4500mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

      Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.77 inch)

      Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (82.08 percents vs 92.12 percents)