Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (399.52 USD vs 408.99 USD)
Better camera (868 points vs 831 points)
Better performance (547 points vs 530 points)
Against:
Worse battery (517 points vs 577 points)
Worse connectivity (148 points vs 831 points)
Worse display (793 points vs 909 points)
Worse design (709 points vs 994 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (35.77 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 490 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.22 percents vs 85.49 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (577 points vs 517 points)
Better connectivity (831 points vs 148 points)
Better display (909 points vs 793 points)
Better design (994 points vs 709 points)
Against:
Higher price (408.99 USD vs 399.52 USD)
Worse camera (831 points vs 868 points)
Worse performance (530 points vs 547 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 35.77 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (490 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.55 inch vs 6.5 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.49 percents vs 85.22 percents)