Vivo iQOO U3x 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: Vivo iQOO U3x 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (349.06 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Better battery (712 points vs 579 points)
Against:
Worse camera (159 points vs 779 points)
Worse performance (536 points vs 725 points)
Worse connectivity (436 points vs 832 points)
Worse display (576 points vs 910 points)
Worse design (734 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.58 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (400 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.79 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (779 points vs 159 points)
Better performance (725 points vs 536 points)
Better connectivity (832 points vs 436 points)
Better display (910 points vs 576 points)
Better design (993 points vs 734 points)
Against:
Higher price (358.24 USD vs 349.06 USD)
Worse battery (579 points vs 712 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 400 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.58 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.48 percents vs 84.79 percents)